DO POINTS PROGRAMS ADD UP TO RELEVANCE AND ENGAGEMENT?
As one of the sponsors of the Loyalty 360 Expo in Orlando this year, our strategy team was there in force – looking and listening for innovation, trends and best practices.
While mobile, referral, and geo targeting are cutting impressive new paths that cross into this space and customer experience and segmentation disciplines are maturing to gold standards, for me, one of the biggest trends may in fact be a fundamental shift in loyalty itself is taking place. That is that loyalty, when defined as a hard-line program of points building or quid-pro-quo behavior, is not a big growth area for most marketers.
Most of the dialogue and information at the Expo surfaced more debate than conclusion about what Loyalty was, let alone any trends clear growth opportunities. Some themes, however, ran through many conversations – and are areas that have been of great focus for us here at SolutionSet.
Those themes were the ideas of:
1. Engagement
2. Relevance
In essence, companies are running programs that achieve these things under a title of “Loyalty”. GameStop’s program was self described as more “CRM titled as Loyalty”. At Starbucks, points accumulation was is a good component of their program, but really only covers about a third of the overall relevance (monetary value customers gain). Their program also tied in community and recognition, which were arguably more emotional, compelling, and uniquely ownable for their brand.
The innovative new social and mobile developments are also pointing more to the ideas of “people like me” than “earn points to redeem”.
As our CEO, Zain Raj, has pointed out in his blog, traditional Loyalty programs are really just frequency programs. As I reflect on the term “Loyalty”, it also strikes me as a very company-centered, not consumer-centered term. It doesn’t seem to cut it with regard to talking about what this stuff is.
My suggestion is “Brand Fan Programs” – the effort to surface and exploit those attributes inherent in a brand and offerings that resonate with a customer group such that we can drive unique levels of relevance and engagement.
As with facebook, fanning should be measurable – and in a way more in tune with these efforts. Fans should have a lifetime value that can be maxed, referral and influence value that can be tallied, data profile completes that can be totaled, spend for return that can be optimized. The behavior, term and measure seem to fit – and fit with the important activities that make them happen: relevance and engagement.
It could be that the best course for a given brand is a more singular focus on a standards points/rewards programs (aka: Frequency Program), and that’s fine. I believe that there is greater opportunity at the higher relevance and engagement end of the scale, building a “Brand Fan Program” for our clients.


